The Adobe Macromedia
War
Home > Build
> Design > Articles
by
Aaron West
Macromedia's
Turn
September 27, 2000
Macromedia Files Patent Infringement
Counterclaims Against Adobe Systems
Read
the Press Release Here
Now it's time for Macromedia to
make a counter charge. They allege that three Macromedia patents have been unlawfully
infringed by Adobe's Illustrator and Premiere products.
Macromedia
claims that Adobe Illustrator violates Macromedia's patent for blending shapes
and colors between paths. This technology is used in the Freehand line of products.
Read
the patent.
The other violation involves Adobe Premiere.
They claim that Premiere, the popular video editing program, violates two of Macromedia's
patents involving waveform editing on computer platforms. Read
the first patent. Read
the second patent.
Who's Right?
It
is obvious to any designer that uses Macromedia and Adobe products that many of
their programs are similar in nature.
| Type
of Software | Macromedia |
Adobe |
|
Bitmap Image Editing |
Fireworks | Photoshop |
| Image
Optimization | Fireworks |
ImageReady |
|
Vector Graphics |
Freehand | Illustrator |
| Vector
Animation | Flash |
LiveMotion |
|
Video Editing* |
Director | Premiere |
| HTML
Development | Dreamweaver |
GoLive |
| * Director and Premiere are essentially different
in nature. Director is for multimedia authoring, Premiere is for video editing.
There are similarities and there are some projects where either tool could be
used. |
While the tabbed interface is new
to Macromedia, other elements such as Layering, Palettes (panels), the toolbars
and tools, are very similar and in many cases identical (eraser tool, bezier tool).
Did these two companies 'steal' from each other? I am not a lawyer or a judge,
but logic dictates that all these similarities aren't coincidental.
If
these companies have stolen or 'borrowed' from each other in the past, so be it.
They are probably both equally 'guilty'.
That being so, why
then are there any lawsuits here at all? Simple. Both of these companies are alone
at the top. Adobe and Macromedia both make outstanding products. Each is the other's
only real competition. As a result, each company stands to profit or lose market
share based on the result of this lawsuit. This is just another form of competition
between these two juggernauts. If Adobe wins the lawsuit, it hurts Macromedia
and vice versa. That could be the reason these charges are being made.
Considering
the stakes involved here and the nature of the accusations being leveled, I think
that it is unlikely that the courts will interfere and force either company to
reengineer its entire product line. So lets just hope, whatever the court's decision
might be, that both Adobe and Macromedia can put this litigiousness behind them
and get back to making outstanding software.
This is not a
legal opinion, but the opinion of an avid user of Macromedia and Adobe products
for several years now.